tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post819892370341308050..comments2023-12-27T05:56:10.287-08:00Comments on Denton Drilling: A Blog by Adam Briggle: Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs: A Big Idea for Informing Prospective HomebuyersAdamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05658985227327961661noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-4308365528359152252013-12-18T05:58:33.854-08:002013-12-18T05:58:33.854-08:00Did you see the Developer said the signs would imp...Did you see the Developer said the signs would impact the title to the land & the requirement is unenforceable?Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04519481971702906046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-10186151702650396412013-12-11T23:54:57.553-08:002013-12-11T23:54:57.553-08:00Compared with accepted techniques using full-scale...Compared with accepted techniques using full-scale rigs and benchmark drill pipe, Coiled-Tubing Drilling (CTD) can significantly decrease environmental influence. CTD is mostly a reentry drilling service that enables operators to more competently find hydrocarbon pouches still untapped in the reservoir. Reentry wells reduce the locality at the exterior impacted by drilling, but also reduce the volumes of iron alloy, cement, and drill cuttings conceived in the drilling method with <a href="http://www.xtremecoil.com/" rel="nofollow">Hydraulic Well Fracturing Process</a>. Coiled-tubing technologies replace the customary rigid, jointed drill pipe with a long, flexible coiled pipe string. This can reduce the cost of drilling, as well as supply a smaller environmental footprint. In particular, less drilling grime is needed, which decreases the use of nonrenewable assets and minimizes the promise for unplanned issues. Coiled tubing furthermore uses slim hole drilling techniques to accomplish very cost-effective drilling and less impact on the natural environment. In supplement, because drilling procedures are not cut off for pipe connections, CTD can use shut" mud circulation methods, which decrease the risk of spills and blowouts.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16278210303874702202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-72633308455890401802013-12-09T09:20:17.635-08:002013-12-09T09:20:17.635-08:00interesting - but aren't child molestor's ...interesting - but aren't child molestor's required to notify neighbors? so is the difference just the nature of a permanent sign? And I don't see a problem with a faulty pipeline valve sign...I am looking at it from a prospective buyer point of view and that would be nice to know. So maybe some of this disagreement hinges on the point of view - existing resident v. potential buyer...? Adamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05658985227327961661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-69121114669990560102013-12-09T07:50:22.127-08:002013-12-09T07:50:22.127-08:00What if the sign said a child molestor lives in th...What if the sign said a child molestor lives in the neighborhood or that the developer has installed faulty pipeline valves? They are both true but I would think the city would be liable for the drop in property value if they put up a sign.Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04519481971702906046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-90254960973068215672013-12-08T13:33:27.322-08:002013-12-08T13:33:27.322-08:00Interesting - but arguably this would better refle...Interesting - but arguably this would better reflect the actual value of their property, because it would let the market actors work on full information (home buyers will know more about the area) - so it may not decrease the value of their property so much as establish a fair and accurate value based on full knowledge for a free market transaction. Adamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05658985227327961661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-69204391587860595132013-12-08T11:55:05.376-08:002013-12-08T11:55:05.376-08:00Because the value of their property has been decre...Because the value of their property has been decreased by the city placing signs & they received nothing as far as bonus/royalty. Still asking Ms. Wolper to weigh in!Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04519481971702906046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-8192245768242607592013-12-08T10:18:38.823-08:002013-12-08T10:18:38.823-08:00How is this unfair? I am curious to see this idea ...How is this unfair? I am curious to see this idea in the round - can you please make the case? Thanks. Adamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05658985227327961661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-71539004147335460262013-12-08T08:43:36.696-08:002013-12-08T08:43:36.696-08:00What you are describing is called slander of title...What you are describing is called slander of title. Signs (that I jokingly suggested in a previous post) would be really unfair to a developer who is not receiving anything from the gas wells, like the Rayzor Ranch developer. Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04519481971702906046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5354570505974016585.post-76266973836795245412013-12-08T00:24:14.124-08:002013-12-08T00:24:14.124-08:00Just an FYI: Grand Prairie, TX amended its Gas Dr...Just an FYI: Grand Prairie, TX amended its Gas Drilling Ordinance 2 weeks ago (November 19, 2013) to include an "Intent to Permit." Going forward, it requires that all operators submit an "Intent to Permit" when they first submit their applications for permit(s) for wells to the City for a specific drilling site. It would not require them to do much of anything but pay the City a $100 fee and then let the City know that they do plan to drill additional wells in the future. <br /><br />That way, when development comes within 300 feet to 700 feet of a drilling site, then the future home owner will be notified by the builder in their paperwork. If there is no "Intent to Permit" filed, then the operator would not be allowed to drill in the future. And so it goes...<br /><br />This is one of those, "oops," moments when a city discovers that they never considered that a housing developer would come in and build homes right up next to a drilling site...even though the protected use setbacks for "established protected uses," is currently 700 ft. Apparently, the Ordinance doesn't work the other way around. So, now buyers will be told about a drilling site that is near their NEW homes and the future plans of the operator. But the details were sketchy, at best, when it was presented for a vote. <br /><br />We think this is still a very murky issue.Westchester Neighborhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02680654681555827977noreply@blogger.com